Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 122b
砖诪讜讗诇 讗讬拽诇注 诇讘讬 讗讘讬谉 讗转讗 讛讛讜讗 谞讻专讬 讗讚诇讬拽 砖专讙讗 讗讛讚专讬谞讛讜 砖诪讜讗诇 诇讗驻讬讛 讻讬讜谉 讚讞讝讗 讚讗讬讬转讬 砖讟专 讜拽讗 拽专讬 讗诪专 讗讚注转讗 讚谞驻砖讬讛 讛讜讗 讚讗讚诇讬拽 讗讛讚专讬谞讛讜 讗讬讛讜 诇讗驻讬讛 讙讘讬 砖专讙讗
What work did our Sages allow a non-Jew to do for Jews on Shabbat? Very little, as it turns out. As we see in the above story, the third-century Babylonian Sage Shemuel is unwilling to take benefit from the non-Jew’s lighting of the lamp, so long as he believes the non-Jew lit it for the benefit of the Jews in the room. Shemuel stands on solid ground here, the Mishnah’s principle being that if a non-Jew performed labor for a Jew on Shabbat, it is forbidden to garner benefit.
Non-Jews are not restricted by the mitzvot that apply to Jews. The covenant of Sinai is between God and the people Israel, and Shabbat rest does not extend beyond the boundaries of of this covenantal peoplehood. Our Sages conceived of a number of ways that non-Jews could connect with God, but Shabbat was not among them.
This said, why did our Sages prohibit us from enlisting non-Jews to perform labor for our benefit on Shabbat? One reason might be that Shabbat loses utterly its meaning if any forbidden labor can be accomplished simply by requesting it. But another reason is perhaps deeper: Shabbat is our day of freedom from labor, a remembrance of the Exodus from Pharaoh’s house of bondage. In that context, how would it look for Jews to be ordering non-Jews about, when the Jews themselves are free from labor?
Questions:
- What can our Sages’ construction of Shabbat teach us about healthy relationships with our non-Jewish friends, colleagues, and neighbors?
- As we enter the period leading up to Pesah, what can Shabbat teach us about slavery and liberation?