The Journey

Rabbi Jan Uhrbach headshot
Beha'alotekha By :  Jan Uhrbach Director of the Block / Kolker Center for Spiritual Arts Posted On Jun 12, 2020 / 5780 | Torah Commentary
Download

How do we progress toward our goals? Individually and societally, how do we know when to move forward, and which direction to go?

At first glance, the description of the Israelites journey from Sinai to the Promised Land seems to offer a model of clarity and ease:

Whenever the cloud lifted from the Tent, the Israelites would set out accordingly; and at the place where the cloud settled, there the Israelites would encamp. At the word of Adonai the Israelites journeyed, and at the word of Adonai they encamped (蛁硊祩麰硒 ’ 硒蛂眥蛁麍 麍敔啞硉 硒麍庠啞硌硉 眥蛁硊祩麰硒 ’ 硊眵麍): they remained encamped as long as the cloud rested on the Mishkan. When the cloud lingered on the Mishkan many days, the Israelites observed Adonais mandate and did not journey on. There were times when the cloud was over the Mishkan for a few daysat the word of Adonai they encamped and at the word of Adonai they journeyed (蛁硊祩麰硒 ’ 硊眵麍 眥蛁硊祩麰硒 ’ 硒麰硌蛁麍). There were times when the cloud was there from evening until morning and would lift in the morningthey would journey. Whether day or night, when the cloud lifted they would journey. Whether two days or a month or a yearhowever long the cloud lingered on the Mishkanthe Israelites remained encamped and did not journey; only when it lifted did they break camp. By the word of Adonai they encamped and by the word of Adonai they journeyed (蛁硊祩麰硒 ’ 硊眵麍 眥蛁硊祩麰硒 ’ 硒麰硌蛁麍); they observed Adonais mandate by the word of Adonai through Moses. (Num. 9:1723)

Its a comforting solutionjust follow the word of God! but unfortunately, not especially helpful. If the Torahs message is eternal, what does this model offer those of us (i.e., all of us) to whom God doesnt speak quite so distinctly?

Fortunately, its not the only answer the Torah provides. Intermingled with this description of a straightforward, unwavering journey at the clear command of God, the Torah offers also a counternarrative.

Looking more closely, we come to suspect that Gods directions were anything but clear. Within this passage itself, Gods guidance is expressed not in distinct speech, but through a clouda metaphor suggesting obfuscation, not clarityand needs to be mediated or interpreted through Moses. And immediately afterwards, we discover that additional navigational technologies are necessary:

  • journeying instructions were given via trumpets specially crafted by Moses and blown by the kohanim. (10:18);
  • the Ark of the Covenant traveled on ahead of them to seek out a resting place for them (10:33);

and most tellingly,

  • Moses pleaded with his father-in-law Hovav to be their human guide ([Moses] said, Please do not abandon us, inasmuch as you know where we should camp in the wilderness, and you will be like eyes for us.) (10:31).

In other words, the path forward is never clear, and God isnt a divine GPS. Revelation and faith shape our vision of where we want to go; they offer a compass pointing to true north, orienting us in the general direction of that vision. But to get there, we need maps, road signs, traffic signals, and human guides with a variety of expertisereligious and secular.

Similarly, although on the surface God intended and Israel expected that they would proceed directly and quickly to the Promised Land (per Rashi on 10:29, 10:33, within three days), the counter-narrative suggests that was never a realistic vision. The commentators sensitively pick up on the challenges inherent even in what was supposed to be a short journeymost especially, the standing still and waiting, for an unknown time.

For example, Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch (on 9:1623) writes: it is not so much the strain of lengthy wanderings as the patient endurance of the lengthy stops which seem to be stressed as the real task of the tests. Similarly, Ramban, Bahya, and Seforno highlight the uncertainty and unpredictability of the encampments as especially difficult to bear. The result was on the one hand impatient, self-reinforcing complaining about the current situation (11:1 ff), and on the other hand disastrous spying ahead into the future, sapping the community of courage and keeping them from moving forward (12:1 ff). Combined, they turned a short trek into a forty-year, roundabout journey.

Here again, the contrast between the idealized intent and the reality on the ground speaks directly to the human condition. A journey worth taking is never linear, never easy, and we never handle it perfectly. While its natural to fantasize about quick fixes, lasting transformationtrue progresstakes time, and inevitably meanders through error, regression, and backlash. Like the Israelites in the wilderness, it is rarely as simple as at the word of Adonai we journey, and at the word of Adonai we encamp. Rather, our fears keep us stuck when were called to advance, and our impatience and inability to bear uncertainty push us ahead when were called to stand still.

Thankfully, Judaism offers a wide complement of navigational tools to hone our powers of discernment, make us more sensitive readers of the terrain we traverse, and keep us on the path. Torah study with a partner, prayer and meditation, halakhic observance, deeds of lovingkindness, the practice of mussar (character development), participation in Jewish community (live or virtual)all function as the maps, signposts, and traffic signals we need. And they nourish our resilience when the road ahead looks frightening, or the waiting and uncertainty seem almost too much to bear.

And ideally, our errors become teachers and guides too. Of the many navigational technologies that the Israelites utilized in the wilderness, perhaps the oddest was the ark: The Ark of the Covenant of Adonai traveled in front of them a three days distance, to seek out a resting place for them (10:33). This presents a difficulty. Elsewhere (Num. 14:44) we learn that “the ark of the covenant of Moses and the Lord did not move from the midst of the camp.” How can the ark be in the middle of the camp, and also somehow travelling by itself three days ahead? In solving the problem, the Midrash (Sifrei Bemidbar 82) offers a profound lesson in how we progress toward our goals. There were two arks: One (with the tablets) stayed in the middle of the camp. A second ark proceeded ahead to seek out the encampments. And what was in that second ark? The broken tablets, destroyed by Moses on seeing the Golden Calf (Exod. 32:19).

The path to the future moves through the past. We look ahead in our travels only to discover that our mistakes and sins, our brokenness, are three days journey aheadallowing us the benefit of critical distance, but waiting for us nevertheless. The ark with our brokenness tells us where we need to stop and waitto explore the issues and places that need attention, rectification, and healing, in order to move forward again in the right direction. It takes courage, patience, and resilience. Perhaps this is why the place where they rested is also called a journey (眥蚹砦 眵硒麍墅詰肯詰 硊蛅 麍菁 蚹硌蚳麍菁 硊麰硌蛁) (Rashi on Exod. 40:38).

The publication and distribution of the 91辦畦 Commentary are made possible by a generous grant from Rita Dee (堝l) and Harold Hassenfeld (堝l).